<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForTheScience.org &#187; Astrobiology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forthescience.org/blog/category/topics/space/astrobiology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forthescience.org/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about science and programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Arsenic bacterium. A case of bad scientific communication?</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2010/12/04/the-arsenic-bacterium-a-case-of-bad-scientific-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://forthescience.org/blog/2010/12/04/the-arsenic-bacterium-a-case-of-bad-scientific-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Borini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissemination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably heard in the news, two days ago everyone was ablaze for a mysterious announcement from NASA. Speculation started on how the new discovery would &#8220;impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life.&#8221; Someone found a habitable planet? Found a message with Seti@HOME? Discovered the primordial soup composition? The buzz resonated and amplified at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://forthescience.org/blog/2010/12/04/the-arsenic-bacterium-a-case-of-bad-scientific-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are they?</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2008/05/10/where-are-they/</link>
		<comments>http://forthescience.org/blog/2008/05/10/where-are-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Borini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Exploration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/2008/05/10/where-are-they/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a very interesting commentary by Nick Bostrom, about the existence of extraterrestrial life and the so-called Fermi Paradox. The point Nick Bostrom presents is sensible: the current evidence is that life is apparently not very frequent in the Universe. Despite all efforts we did toward finding life, intelligent or not, we failed. Moreover, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://forthescience.org/blog/2008/05/10/where-are-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

