<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norwegian spiral sets the news ablaze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/</link>
	<description>A blog about science and programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:01:18 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Borini</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/comment-page-1/#comment-9401</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Borini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 02:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=262#comment-9401</guid>
		<description>It was moving, there was a trail. The fact that it wasn&#039;t rushing away, but remained relatively put is because it was flying at considerable height. When you observe an airplane flying in the sky, you see it moving slowly, even if it&#039;s moving at 900 km/hour. For the exact same reason, even if the rocket was moving, its distance from the observer was so large that its apparent movement was negligible.
In addition to that, if something distant flies directly towards you, it seems not to move, because it is reducing its distance from you, but you cannot evaluate it (you evaluate distance by focus or parallax). If you observed the sky frequently, you probably had the chance to observe a falling star heading just straight in front of you. It&#039;s rare, but happens. What you see is just a bright dot that appears and stays put in the sky, to disappear briefly afterwards. That object is moving fast, but since it is doing it right in front of you, you cannot appreciate any change in its angular position, hence it appears static.

All what I said applies to the rocket as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was moving, there was a trail. The fact that it wasn&#8217;t rushing away, but remained relatively put is because it was flying at considerable height. When you observe an airplane flying in the sky, you see it moving slowly, even if it&#8217;s moving at 900 km/hour. For the exact same reason, even if the rocket was moving, its distance from the observer was so large that its apparent movement was negligible.<br />
In addition to that, if something distant flies directly towards you, it seems not to move, because it is reducing its distance from you, but you cannot evaluate it (you evaluate distance by focus or parallax). If you observed the sky frequently, you probably had the chance to observe a falling star heading just straight in front of you. It&#8217;s rare, but happens. What you see is just a bright dot that appears and stays put in the sky, to disappear briefly afterwards. That object is moving fast, but since it is doing it right in front of you, you cannot appreciate any change in its angular position, hence it appears static.</p>
<p>All what I said applies to the rocket as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesusActionFigure</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/comment-page-1/#comment-9400</link>
		<dc:creator>JesusActionFigure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=262#comment-9400</guid>
		<description>If the thing was a rocket, don&#039;t you think that the source of the spiral (as Russia suggests) would be flying into the sky, like a rocket? It doesn&#039;t make sense to me that a rocket, would stay immobile in the sky, supposedly spinning and spitting out a spiral shaped excretion. Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the thing was a rocket, don&#8217;t you think that the source of the spiral (as Russia suggests) would be flying into the sky, like a rocket? It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me that a rocket, would stay immobile in the sky, supposedly spinning and spitting out a spiral shaped excretion. Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Borini</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/comment-page-1/#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Borini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 04:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=262#comment-9393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s part of development of the Bulava rocket, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava . So in some sense it&#039;s new war technology in testing, but hardly secret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s part of development of the Bulava rocket, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava</a> . So in some sense it&#8217;s new war technology in testing, but hardly secret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/comment-page-1/#comment-9390</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=262#comment-9390</guid>
		<description>could be some kind of military secret testing of som kind of new technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could be some kind of military secret testing of som kind of new technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter77</title>
		<link>http://forthescience.org/blog/2009/12/10/norwegian-spiral-sets-the-news-ablaze/comment-page-1/#comment-8748</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthescience.org/blog/?p=262#comment-8748</guid>
		<description>Funny! But not alien! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny! But not alien! <img src='http://forthescience.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
